GA63 / GA 63 / GA LXIII / SS 1923

Matérias

• Buren (GA63:nota 1) – Facticidade (Faktizität)
  28 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  The prime example of the threefold meaning of auf is Heidegger’s use of this term in the description of his own general “hermeneutics of facticity.” In §3, he states that facticity will be “interrogated auf the character of its being.” As he explains in the same section, this entails the following three moments:
  (1) His interpretation initially “engages” facticity and “brings it into play” by looking to “the awhileness of the temporal particularity” of its be-ing, i.e., to its “be-ing (…)

• Greisch: Une herméneutique de la facticité
  29 de maio de 2017, por Cardoso de Castro

  Extraits des pages 34-38, de l’édition PUF, 1994.
  Nous venons de jeter un premier regard sur l’allure générale d’une approche phénoménologique, hérissée d’obstacles terminologiques, de la vie, qui se fixe pour but de « voir la chose principale de la philosophie, la facticité » (GA61, 99). L’analyse de la vie factuelle nous place devant l’alternative suivante : allons-nous créditer la vie d’une transparence parfaite, de cette pureté cristalline, dont la logique nous offre la meilleure (…)

• Kisiel (1995:315-319) – Prelúdio a "Conceito de Tempo" (GA64)
  18 de janeiro de 2019, por Cardoso de Castro

  The core idea of BT as we know it receives its first “oral publication” in the public address entitled “The Concept of Time” presented to the Marburg Theologians’ Society on July 25, 1924. Gadamer aptly calls it the “Urform” of BT. Not yet a draft of BT, it is nevertheless the first major and quite public step toward the extant book BT, by elaborating its core structure, which in retrospect finds its seminal roots in the 1922 Introduction. For in that Einleitung (cf. chap. 5), Heidegger (…)

• GA63:31-32 — das Man - o a-gente
  8 de fevereiro de 2019, por Cardoso de Castro

  Kirchner
  Por ora, a título de adiantamento, é possível dizer a respeito que o ser-aí possui seu caráter público e sua visão. O ser-aí move-se (fenômeno fundamental) num modo determinado de falar de si mesmo, ao que chamaremos de falação (termo técnico). Nesse falar “de” si mesmo está e reside o modo mediano e público pelo qual o ser-aí se toma e se conserva a si mesmo. Na falação está e reside uma compreensão prévia determinada, que o ser-aí possui de si mesmo: o “como isto ou aquilo” (…)

• GA63:7 – Faktizität - Faticidade
  28 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  […] esse ser-aí em cada ocasião (fenômeno da “ocasionalidade”; cf. demorar-se, não ter pressa, ser-aí-junto-a, ser-aí), na medida em que é “aí” em seu caráter ontológico no tocante ao seu ser.
  Renato Kirchner
  Faticidade é a designação para o caráter ontológico de “nosso” ser-aí “próprio”. Mais especificamente, a expressão significa: esse ser-aí em cada ocasião (fenômeno da “ocasionalidade”; cf. demorar-se, não ter pressa, ser-aí-junto-a, ser-aí), na medida em que é “aí” em seu (…)

• GA63: Estrutura da Obra
  13 de fevereiro de 2017, por Cardoso de Castro

  Índice de diferentes traduções e do original
  Renato Kirshner
  Introdução
  §1. O título “ontologia”
  “Doutrina do ser”; válido somente em sentido mais amplo. Inaceitável enquanto disciplina particular. Na fenomenologia: o caráter objetual provém da consciência da objetualidade Omite-se a questão no campo do ser do qual se deve extrair todo sentido ontológico A partir disso, portanto, o título é propriamente: hermenêutica da faticidade
  Prefácio - Hermenêutica da faticidade Colocar (…)

• Buren (GA63:nota 9) – Jeweiligkeit, Verweilen, Weile
  28 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  the characteristic of “whiling” or “tarrying for a while” (Verweilen) in the “there” of “being-there” and along a finite “span” of temporality
  Jeweiligkeit, Verweilen, Weile. The neologism Jeweiligkeit is coined from the adjective jeweilig, which normally means “respective,” “prevailing,” or “at the particular time” (d. der jeweilige König [”the king at the particular time”]), but has the literal meaning of “in each case [je] for a while at the particular time [weilig].” Accordingly, in (…)

• Buren (GA63:nota 1) – Ontologia (Ontologie)
  28 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  Ontology and logic need to be brought back to their original unity in the problem of facticity and understood as offshoots of a fundamental kind of research which can be described as the phenomenological hermeneutics of facticity.
  1. “Ontology” was the second of two initial titles Heidegger gave his course. The very first title “Logic” is related to his treatment in §2 of Plato’s and Aristotle’s characterization of λόγος (“discourse” about being) as ἑρμηνεία (“interpretation”) and to (…)

• Buren (GA63:nota 1) – “Auf,” terms formed from it, and “auslegen.”
  28 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  [auf] I have used “with respect to, on the basis of, and with a view to” for them. In other cases where auf occurs as a technical term, I use either “with respect to,” “on the basis of,” “toward,” “in the direction of,” “to,” “at,” or some combination of these.
  Still another set of terms is formed simply around the preposition auf which occurs with a number of the other terms discussed above and below. In some of Heidegger’s uses of it, it has all three of its possible directional and (…)

• Buren (GA63:nota 53) – begegnen
  29 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  “Happens to be encountered’ has sometimes been employed for begegnen since it expresses not only the dynamic middle-voice meaning of the German term but also the “unpredictability” and “incalculability” of Dasein’s and the world’s “being-encountered” (§§3 and 25).
  Welt ist, was begegnet. Whereas in English we would say “the world is something we encounter,” in Heidegger’s German sentence, which employs the verb begegnen (“to encounter”) according to normal usage, the subject and object (…)

• Buren (GA63:nota 63) – considerações sobre §§20-23
  29 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  In taking up the previous description of Heidegger’s home in §20 as an illustration of the be-ing of facticity in the “awhileness of its temporal particularity” and now making it the subject matter of ontological interpretation, the final chapter reintroduces many of the colloquial terms and phrases used there. Accordingly, my translation of this chapter reproduces as exactly as possible the translations of the relevant German terms and phrases I used in §20. However, even in the German (…)

• Buren (GA63:nota 75) – Uses of “um”
  29 de maio de 2023, por Cardoso de Castro

  Dieses im Verweisungszusammenhang hin-und-her-Gehen charakterisiert Sorgen als Umgehen. As Heidegger’s use of the preposition um (“about,” “around”) especially in this sentence, in the previous paragraph, and in §23 (see endnote 68) makes dear, he sometimes intends it to have both (1) the intentional-directional meaning of “about” in the sense of “care about” (Sorge um), being “concerned about” (besorgt um), or “that about which care is concerned” (das, worum es in der Sorge geht) and (2) (…)