Ent-setzung, setting-free, des-locamento, dé-portement, se-paración

Setting-free [Ent-setzung] consists in the en-ownment [Er-eignung] of Dasein   in such a way that en-ownment withdraws in the t/here [Da] (in the ab-ground [Ab-grund  ] of the unprotected and unsupported [Ungestützten und Ungeschützten]) which is thus lit up. Setting-free and withdrawal [Entzug  ] belong to be-ing as enowning [Ereignis  ]. Thus nothing occurs within the sphere of beings. Be-ing remains nonappearing; but with a being as such it can happen that it moves into the clearing [Lichtung  ] of what is non-ordinary [Un-gewöhnlichen], casts away its ordinariness [Gewöhnlichkeit  ], and has to put itself up for decision [Ent-scheidung] as to how it suffices for be-ing. But this does not   mean how a being would approximate and correspond to be-ing but rather how a being preserves and loses the truth of the essential swaying of be-ing [Wahrheit   der Wesung   des Seyns] – and therein comes into what is its ownmost [Wesen], which consists in such preserving [Verwahrung]. But the fundamental forms of this preserving are disclosure [Aufschluß] of a wholeness [Gänze  ] of worlding [Weltens] (world) and the self-closure [Sichverschließen] vis-à-vis every projecting-opening [Entwurf  ] (earth). These fundamental forms first allow the preserving to arise and are themselves strifing, a strifing which holds sway from within the intimacy of the enownment of enowning [Innigkeit   der Ereignung des Ereignisses]. In each case on each side of this strifing is that which we metaphysically know as the sensible and the supersensible [Sinnliche und Unsinnliche]. [GA65EM  :339-340]