Andenken  , remémoration, rememoração, recalling

When I forget the umbrella at the hairdresser, what is that? I did forget taking the umbrella with me, but not   the umbrella. I omitted it I did not think of it. I was just concerned with something else. Therefore, here forgetting is a privation of having thought of something. Here, memory [is understood as] recalling something [Andenken] . [1] (GA89  :212; tr. Mayr & Askay)

VIDE Denken

andenken = pensar da lembrança [GA7  ]
lembrança
an-denken = pensar sobre [GA6T2  :402]
mémoire
commemoration

Si la pensée, en se souvenant de ce qui a été (das Gewesene  ), laisse à celui-ci son essence et n’altère pas son règne en le portant hâtivement au compte du présent, alors nous découvrons que ce qui a été, par son retour dans l’Andenken, s’étend par delà notre présent (Gegenwart  ) et vient à nous comme un avenir (ein Zukünftiges). Brusquement, l’Andenken doit penser ce qui a été comme quelque chose de non-encore-déployé (als ein Nochnicht-Entfaltetes).. Cf. aussi SvG  , p. 107 (147). [AHolderlin 127; apud Zarader   27]

---

NT: memória = Andenken: essa palavra se compõe do verbo, denken (pensar) e da preposição, an (em, ao lado de, junto a), dai seu sentido corrente de recordação, lembrança. Heidegger o toma em sua acepção originária de pensar em. É também esse o significado originário de memória. [CartaH]

---

Pensar a partir do ser ainda não significa: de volta ao ser, pensá-lo de maneira rememorante [an-denken] em sua verdade. O ser permanece impensado naquele pensamento que, enquanto o pensamento metafísico, é tomado como sendo o pensamento puro e simples. O fato de o ser mesmo permanecer impensado na metafísica enquanto tal é um permanecer impensado de um tipo insigne e único. [GA6T2:546; tr. Casanova  :264]

---

The structure of this process [of letting Being be itself] will take the form of a re-collection (Andenken): the tri-dimensional process by which Being [Sein  ] comes (“future” [Zukunft  ]) to the thinker [Denker  ] in and through what already-has-been (“past” [Gewesenheit]) and is rendered manifest (“present” [Gegenwart]) by the words that the thinker himself formulates. Such, too, is the structure of the thought-ful [Denkend] dialogue. Profoundly a temporal   process (future-past-present), foundational thought [wesentliche Denken] is by this very fact historical, sc. thinks Being-as-history [Seinsgeschichte] in continual advent to thought [Denken] through its dialogue with the past. Furthermore, thought [Denken] thinks not only Being-as-history [Seinsgeschichte] (inter-mittence), but [22] thinks every mittence [Geschick  ] of Being [Sein] in its negativity, as well as in its positivity, endeavoring to comprehend and express not what another thinker thought [Denken]/said [Gesagte], but what he did not think [Denken]/say [Sagen  ], could not think [Denken]/say [Sagen], and why he could not think [Denken]/say [Sagen] it. [RHPT:21-22]