Tag: GA63
-
Introdução §1. O título “ontologia” “Doutrina do ser”; válido somente em sentido mais amplo. Inaceitável enquanto disciplina particular. Na fenomenologia: o caráter objetual provém da consciência da objetualidade Omite-se a questão no campo do ser do qual se deve extrair todo sentido ontológico A partir disso, portanto, o título é propriamente: hermenêutica da faticidade Prefácio…
-
Por ora, a título de adiantamento, é possível dizer a respeito que o ser-aí possui seu caráter público e sua visão. O ser-aí move-se (fenômeno fundamental) num modo determinado de falar de si mesmo, ao que chamaremos de falação (termo técnico). Nesse falar “de” si mesmo está e reside o modo mediano e público pelo…
-
Faticidade é a designação para o caráter ontológico de “nosso” ser-aí “próprio”. Mais especificamente, a expressão significa: esse ser-aí em cada ocasião (fenômeno da “ocasionalidade”; cf. demorar-se, não ter pressa, ser-aí-junto-a, ser-aí), na medida em que é “aí” em seu caráter ontológico no tocante ao seu ser. Ser-aí no tocante a seu ser significa: não…
-
Jeweiligkeit, Verweilen, Weile. The neologism Jeweiligkeit is coined from the adjective jeweilig, which normally means “respective,” “prevailing,” or “at the particular time” (d. der jeweilige König (”the king at the particular time”)), but has the literal meaning of “in each case (je) for a while at the particular time (weilig).” Accordingly, in coining the term…
-
1. “Ontology” was the second of two initial titles Heidegger gave his course. The very first title “Logic” is related to his treatment in §2 of Plato’s and Aristotle’s characterization of λόγος (“discourse” about being) as ἑρμηνεία (“interpretation”) and to his analysis in the same section of the title of Aristotle’s Περὶ ἑρμηνείας (On Interpretation),…
-
(1) His interpretation initially “engages” facticity and “brings it into play” by looking to “the awhileness of the temporal particularity” of its be-ing, i.e., to its “be-ing (factically there as “our own” for a while at the particular time),” and thematizes this be-ing as a futural and open-ended “being-possible” or “existence” (see endnote 21) which…
-
Still another set of terms is formed simply around the preposition auf which occurs with a number of the other terms discussed above and below. In some of Heidegger’s uses of it, it has all three of its possible directional and horizonal meanings: (1) “toward,” (2) “on the basis of” (“starting from”), and (3) “with…
-
Welt ist, was begegnet. Whereas in English we would say “the world is something we encounter,” in Heidegger’s German sentence, which employs the verb begegnen (“to encounter”) according to normal usage, the subject and object of the verb are reversed and the sentence literally says “the world is what en-counters (us)” in the sense of…
-
First, the present chapter often does not use quotation marks when it reintroduces text from §20. For example, “used to . . . (gebraucht zu-), no longer really suitable for (geeignet für) …” in the present sentence (see also the opening of §23) reintroduces: “Its standing-there in the room means: Playing this role in such…
-
The latter meaning is connected to the theme of “factical spatiality” which was introduced in §18 and is reintroduced in the following paragraph in the present section. The main reason for Heidegger’s use of the above double meaning of um is that he wants to make the point that what is spatially “around” us, i.e.,…