correct

richtig

But suppose now that technology were no mere means, how would it stand   with the will to master it? Yet we said, did we not  , that the instrumental definition   of technology is CORRECT? To be sure. The CORRECT always fixes upon something pertinent in whatever is under consideration. However, in order to be CORRECT, this fixing by no means needs to uncover the thing in question in its essence. Only at the point where such an uncovering happens does the true come to pass [sich ereignet  ]. For that reason the merely CORRECT is not yet the true. Only the true brings us into a free relationship with that which concerns us from out of its essence. Accordingly, the CORRECT instrumental definition of technology still does not show us technology’s essence. In order that we may arrive at this, or at least come close to it, we must seek the true by way of the CORRECT. We must ask: What is the instrumental itself? [GA7   QCT  , p 6]

---

[…] The Greeks have the word aletheia   for revealing. The Romans translate this with veritas. We say "truth" and usually understand it as the CORRECTness of an idea  . [GA7 QCT  , p 12]

---

In a similar way the unconcealment in accordance with which nature presents itself as a calculable complex of the effects of forces can indeed permit CORRECT determinations; but precisely through these successes the danger can remain that in the midst of all that is CORRECT the true will withdraw. [GA7 QCT, p 26]