Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| |
| estudos:gelven:gelven-1972190-193-culpa-schuld [16/01/2026 14:40] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | estudos:gelven:gelven-1972190-193-culpa-schuld [27/01/2026 08:55] (current) – mccastro |
|---|
| ===== GELVEN (1972:190-193) – CULPA (SCHULD) ===== | ===== CULPA (SCHULD) (1972:190-193) ===== |
| 1. To be guilty is to be the basis of a nullity. If one looks at the overall enterprise of Heidegger's thought, one sees that he is attempting to show how men can reason modally about their own existence, that such reasoning cannot depend upon any characterization of the world as made up of parts, since such a world is itself derived from the modal and is merely the result of one among several ways to interpret the world. In order to make a modal inquiry into human existence possible, however, the principle of discrimination between an acceptable and an unacceptable characterization of such modes must be shown to reside in the very way in which human beings can be said to exist. | 1. To be guilty is to be the basis of a nullity. If one looks at the overall enterprise of Heidegger's thought, one sees that he is attempting to show how men can reason modally about their own existence, that such reasoning cannot depend upon any characterization of the world as made up of parts, since such a world is itself derived from the modal and is merely the result of one among several ways to interpret the world. In order to make a modal inquiry into human existence possible, however, the principle of discrimination between an acceptable and an unacceptable characterization of such modes must be shown to reside in the very way in which human beings can be said to exist. |
| |
