estudos:coyne:coyne-racionalismo-romanticismo
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| estudos:coyne:coyne-racionalismo-romanticismo [16/01/2026 14:40] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | estudos:coyne:coyne-racionalismo-romanticismo [27/01/2026 12:19] (current) – mccastro | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== | + | ====== Racionalismo e romanticismo |
| The rationalists had said that we should eschew feeling, emotion, and other distortions to knowledge in favor of pure reason. In contrast, the romantics rehabilitated and promoted feeling and emotion. Whereas the rationalists and empiricists debated the nature of reality and how we can know it, the romantics elevated the intangible world of the imagination. Rationalism and romanticism converged on the theme of liberation from tradition and authority and elevated the concept of the individual, who for the romantics was the source of creativity. Subjectivity was the key to art. For Schlegel, creative writing "must indeed be entirely personal, subjective in design and intention, conveying indirectly, and almost symbolically, | The rationalists had said that we should eschew feeling, emotion, and other distortions to knowledge in favor of pure reason. In contrast, the romantics rehabilitated and promoted feeling and emotion. Whereas the rationalists and empiricists debated the nature of reality and how we can know it, the romantics elevated the intangible world of the imagination. Rationalism and romanticism converged on the theme of liberation from tradition and authority and elevated the concept of the individual, who for the romantics was the source of creativity. Subjectivity was the key to art. For Schlegel, creative writing "must indeed be entirely personal, subjective in design and intention, conveying indirectly, and almost symbolically, | ||
estudos/coyne/coyne-racionalismo-romanticismo.txt · Last modified: by mccastro
