https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/ 2026-05-07T04:40:26+00:00 https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/ https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=wiki:dokuwiki.svg text/html 2026-02-10T01:16:13+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:mayr-askay:mayr-askay-existence-ek-sistence&rev=1770686173&do=diff EXISTENCE – EK-SISTENCE For Heidegger, existence does Not refer to the traditional, metaphysically understood existentia (present-at-handness of something). It refers exclusively to the human being's existence as Ek-sistence (the human being's “standing out” into the truth of being, i.e., as the “lighting” or “clearing'' of being (Lichtung des Seins)). In contrast to any misunderstanding of the human being as a self-contained “subject” vis-a-vis “objects,” Ek-sistence literally means standing o… text/html 2026-02-10T01:16:13+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:mayr-askay:mayr-askay-ontologische-differenz&rev=1770686173&do=diff ontologische Differenz For Heidegger the “ontological difference” between being and beings is prior to Western metaphysic’s distinction between existentia (that a thing is) and essentia (what a thing is). In its unique, temporal-ecstatic ek-sistence, human Da-sein transcends all beings by its understanding of being. According to Heidegger, Western metaphysics has forgotten being in favor of beings because of the epochal (historical) withdrawal of being itself. Even the metaphysical concept of G… text/html 2026-02-10T01:16:13+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:mayr-askay:mayr-askay-vernehmen-to-receive-perceive&rev=1770686173&do=diff Vernehmen – TO RECEIVE-PERCEIVE We translate the German vernehmen with the hyphenated expression “to receive-perceive.” In its existential-ontological meaning vernehmen implies receptivity (Greek νοειν: to perceive, to understand, to listen in). In a more active, juridical sense, it means that which the judge comes to perceive through the interrogation of witnesses. Vernehmen refers to a phenomenologically immediate, nontheoretical, receptive perceiving. This contrasts with vor-stellen, “to rep… text/html 2026-02-10T01:16:13+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:mayr-askay:mayr-askay-wesen-essence&rev=1770686173&do=diff Wesen – ESSENCE For Heidegger, “essence” (Wesen) must Not be understood in the traditional, metaphysical sense of a timeless essentia, i.e., quidditas, but in the verbal sense of the old Germanic word wesan (to dwell), as the temporal way of unfolding, of a coming to presence, and as an enduring of the being of something. The essential ground of human existing is not a first cause, nor any other cause, but rather the revealing-concealing mystery of being, which grants the human being his Da-sei… text/html 2026-01-27T11:30:54+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:mayr-askay:start&rev=1769513454&do=diff Mayr-Askay ---------- mayr-askay index