https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/ 2026-07-26T08:40:32+00:00 https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/ https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=wiki:dokuwiki.svg text/html 2026-07-25T01:01:14+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:auf&rev=1784941274&do=diff AUF- “auf,” terms formed from it, and “auslegen.” Still another set of terms is formed simply around the preposition auf which occurs with a number of the other terms discussed above and below. In some of Heidegger’s uses of it, it has all three of its possible directional and horizonal meanings: (1) “toward,” (2) “on the basis of” (“starting from”), and (3) “with a view to.” In these cases, it is used to describe the following three directional and horizonal dimensions of interpretation: (1) … text/html 2026-07-25T01:02:05+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:begegnen&rev=1784941325&do=diff BEGEGNEN Welt ist, Was begegnet. Whereas in English we would say “the world is something we encounter,” in Heidegger’s German sentence, which employs the verb begegnen (“to encounter”) according to normal usage, the subject and object of the verb are reversed and the sentence literally says “the world is what en-counters (us)” in the sense of “happens (to us).” Moreover, here and often elsewhere Heidegger does Not state the object of the verb (e.g., “us,” “one”), so that the above sentence read… text/html 2026-07-25T00:57:11+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:bekummerung&rev=1784941031&do=diff BEKÜMMERUNG ("WORRY") (GA63:NOTA 17) Heidegger had been using the homey but dumsy technical term Bekümmerung (”worry”) since around 1920. See “Anmerkungen an Karl Jaspers Psychologie der Weltanschauungen,” in Wegmarken, pp. 5ff.; translated as “Comments on Karl text/html 2026-07-25T01:02:45+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:blickstellung-blickstand&rev=1784941365&do=diff BLICKSTELLUNG blickstellung - blickstand - posição de mirada “Position for looking,” “position of looking,” and “position which looks at” have been used for Blickstellung and Blickstand, since as Heidegger makes clear in §17B he means by these terms not simply a reflective and deliberately adopted epistemological “standpoint,” but more literally and in a deeper sense a “position” (Stellung) and “state” (Stand) of interpretive “looking” (Blicken) or “seeing” (Sehen) which we are in “at the part… text/html 2026-07-25T08:30:37+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:consideracoes-sobre-20-23&rev=1784968237&do=diff CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE §§20-23 First, the present chapter often does Not use quotation marks when it reintroduces text from §20. For example, “used to . . . (gebraucht zu-), no longer really suitable for (geeignet für) ...” in the present sentence (see also the opening of §23) reintroduces: “Its standing-there in the room means: Playing this role in such and such characteristic use (Gebrauch). This and that about it is ‘impractical,’ unsuitable (ungeeignet).” Another good example is the following … text/html 2026-07-25T00:57:34+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:das-da&rev=1784941054&do=diff DAS DA (AÍ) (GA63:NOTA 9) When the introduction to Part One, §6, and §§18ff. of Heidegger’s course explore the “there” of Dasein and its world as that wherein it “whiles,” when §§24 and 26 explain that the ἀλήθεια (“truth,” “uncoveredness,” “disdosedness”) of the “there” of the world is that “wherein concern holds itself and sojourns (sich außält)” insofar as this concern is a “ἕξις” (“state of having,” “habit”) or Gewohnheit (“habitual way of dwelling,” “habit,” “custom”), when §§11-12 refer … text/html 2026-07-25T01:00:22+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:das-man&rev=1784941222&do=diff DAS MAN In order to express the average, public, and anonymous manner of Dasein’s being-interpreted in the “today,” Heidegger coins the noun das Man from the indefinite pronoun man, which could be rendered as “one,” “everyone,” “they,” “people,” or even “it.” Man sagt. . . means “one says that . . .” everyone says that . . . “they say that . . . “people say that . . , or “it is said that. . . .” Likewise, das tut man Nicht means “one does Not do that,” “no one does that,” “they do not do that,”… text/html 2026-07-25T00:56:32+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:einsatz&rev=1784940992&do=diff EINSATZ (“ENGAGING”) (GA63:NOTA 16) The single previous occurrence of Einsatz Was translated simply as “engaging,” but here “initially engaging and bringing into play” has been used. Subsequently, Einsatz is rendered as “initial engagement and bringing into play” and the verb einsetzen as “to engage itself (and bring itself into play)” or as “to put forth initially and bring into play.” Einsatz, which Heidegger always uses in the sense of “the initial (interpretive) engaging and bringing into … text/html 2026-07-25T01:03:32+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:existenziell-existenzial&rev=1784941412&do=diff EXISTENZIELL - EXISTENZIAL The three occurrences of existenziell in the present section and in section VI of the Appendix have been translated as “existential.” In its common spelling, i.e., existentiell, this term has the same meaning as the present-day English term “existential” in usages such as “of existential significance.” Heidegger indeed intends existenziell to be understood in this common meaning, but he defines it – in connection with the Kierkegaardian term Existenz (“existence”) int… text/html 2026-07-25T00:55:11+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:faktizitat&rev=1784940911&do=diff FACTICIDADE (FAKTIZITÄT) (GA63:NOTA 1) (1) His interpretation initially “engages” facticity and “brings it into play” by looking to “the awhileness of the temporal particularity” of its be-ing, i.e., to its “be-ing (factically there as “our own” for a while at the particular time),” and thematizes this be-ing as a futural and open-ended “being-possible” or “existence” (see endnote 21) which cannot be “calculated and worked out in advance” as to how it will be “encountered” (see endnote 53), an… text/html 2026-07-25T01:01:45+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:halten&rev=1784941305&do=diff HALTEN (sich) halten, sich aufhalten, aufhalten (bei), aufenthalt Connected terms formed from “halten.” Heidegger uses another group of poetic terms in connection with those above, i.e., (sich) halten, sich aufhalten, Aufhalten (bei), Aufenthalt, and other terms formed from halten. The verb sich halten auf means literally “to halt” or “hold oneself” (sich halten) “at” (auf) some place, linger there, and “Not run away,” as Heidegger colloquially puts it in the passage with which this endnote be… text/html 2026-07-25T00:55:37+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:intencionalidade-da-consciencia&rev=1784940937&do=diff INTENCIONALIDADE DA CONSCIÊNCIA (TERMOS DE HUSSERL) (GA63:NOTA 1) Intentional terms appropriated from Husserl. Not only does Heidegger’s discussion of Husserl’s phenomenology occupy a central place in his course (§14), but his characterization of the dynamic directional nature of the interpretation of the be-ing of facticity takes up, though with less emphasis than in his preceding writings, the following four terms which text/html 2026-07-25T01:06:17+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:interpreting&rev=1784941577&do=diff HERMENEUEIN (”INTERPRETING”) (GA63:NOTA 11) Both “to announce” and “to make known” have been used here to translate kundgeben, which is the term Heidegger employs to describe what ἑρμηνεύειν (”interpreting”) precisely does. Both English terms are used since neither by itself expresses the twofold meaning of kundgeben: (1) its linguistic and kerygmatic meaning of “to announce,” “proclaim,” “herald,” “communicate,” or “express” and (2) its phenomenological meaning of “to reveal” or “make known.”… text/html 2026-07-25T01:04:27+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:jeweiligkeit-verweilen-weile&rev=1784941467&do=diff JEWEILIGKEIT, VERWEILEN, WEILE Jeweiligkeit, Verweilen, Weile. The neologism Jeweiligkeit is coined from the adjective jeweilig, which normally means “respective,” “prevailing,” or “at the particular time” (d. der jeweilige König (”the king at the particular time”)), but has the literal meaning of “in each case (je) for a while at the particular time (weilig).” Accordingly, in coining the term Jeweiligkeit, Heidegger has in mind both its more conventional meaning of something like “temporal par… text/html 2026-07-25T01:05:34+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:noein&rev=1784941534&do=diff NOEIN In his 1922 essay “Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles,” pp. 255ff., Heidegger had translated the term νοεῖν in Parmenides and Aristotle as both Vernehmen (“perceiving”) and Vermeinen (“meaning (something)”). In the present text, he combines these two translations in the phrase vernehmendes Vermeinen, for which “perceptual mean-ing” has been used. The hyphenated term “mean-ing” has been employed to indicate that Heidegger has in mind the act of “mean-ing” or intending as opp… text/html 2026-07-25T00:55:57+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:ontologie&rev=1784940957&do=diff ONTOLOGIA (ONTOLOGIE) (GA63:NOTA 1) 1. “Ontology” Was the second of two initial titles Heidegger gave his course. The very first title “Logic” is related to his treatment in §2 of Plato’s and Aristotle’s characterization of λόγος (“discourse” about being) as ἑρμηνεία (“interpretation”) and to his analysis in the same section of the title of Aristotle’s Περὶ ἑρμηνείας (On Interpretation), where “logic” (study of “discourse” about being) is being characterized as a study of “interpretation,” i.e… text/html 2026-07-25T08:30:05+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:start&rev=1784968205&do=diff Hemenêutica da Facticidade Martin Heidegger. Ontology – The Henneneutics of Facticity. Tr. John van Buren. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. Resumo do “Epílogo do Tradutor” 1. O curso de licões de 1923, “Ontologia – A Hermenêutica da Facticidade text/html 2026-07-25T01:04:43+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:uses-of-um&rev=1784941483&do=diff USES OF “UM” The latter meaning is connected to the theme of “factical spatiality” which Was introduced in §18 and is reintroduced in the following paragraph in the present section. The main reason for Heidegger’s use of the above double meaning of um is that he wants to make the point that what is spatially “around” us, i.e., the “there” of the “world around us,” is always at the same time what we intentionally care “about” or are concerned “about,” and vice-versa. Putting this in other terms,… text/html 2026-07-25T01:04:57+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:vorhandenheit-vorschein&rev=1784941497&do=diff VORHANDENHEIT - VORSCHEIN “Availability in advance” and “advance appearance” have been used respectively for Vorhandenheit and Vorschein. As is made clear by the hyphenation of Vorschein in the present sentence and by the subsequent use of both terms, Heidegger exploits the literal meaning of their prefix vor (“fore,” “in advance”) in order to make the point that the disclosedness and being-interpreted of “ready-to-Hand” things in the “environing world” (i.e., “availability”) and that of others… text/html 2026-07-25T01:05:09+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://ereignis.hyperlogos.info/doku.php?id=estudos:buren:ga63:zeitigen-zeitigung-zeitlichkeit&rev=1784941509&do=diff ZEITIGEN - ZEITIGUNG - ZEITLICHKEIT “To temporalize and unfold” translates the term zeitigen which occurs again in §18. Zeitigung, which occurs in §26 and in section V of the Appendix, is rendered as either “temporalizing” or “temporalization.” These terms are related to Zeit (“time”) and Zeitlichkeit (“temporality”) and even more dosely to zeitig (“timely,” “seasonable,” “ripe,” “mature,” “having unfolded”). Heidegger accordingly intends zeitigen both in its philosophical meaning of “to tempor…